Sprints 46-58 implement the cross-language porting foundation: language-to-IR adapters, equivalence checking, gate validation, legacy ingestion, managed/dynamic families, low-level/logic-actor semantics, debug workflow tooling, AST-native family tools, Rust/CPP raising tools, system-level orchestration, query family, and porting gates. Sprint 59 adds the governance layer (policy packs, review boards, waiver packets, ambiguity triage, decision ledger) with the whetstone_review_porting_decision MCP tool. Also includes: sprint plans 46-130, MCP taskitem pipeline scripts, CLAUDE.md, docs, and full test matrix (steps 689-828). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
392 lines
14 KiB
Markdown
392 lines
14 KiB
Markdown
# Feature Requests
|
||
|
||
> Backlog of feature ideas to triage into future sprints (e.g., Sprint 6/7).
|
||
|
||
## Security Vulnerability Awareness (Dependencies) — IMPLEMENTED (Sprint 6, Steps 190–195)
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Warn when a dependency has known vulnerabilities and surface safer alternatives.
|
||
|
||
**Concept:**
|
||
- Maintain a vulnerability knowledge base (local cache + optional remote sources).
|
||
- When a dependency is added/updated, show immediate warnings.
|
||
- Surface findings in the Dependencies panel and Problems list.
|
||
- Optionally block auto-upgrade to vulnerable versions.
|
||
|
||
**Potential Data Sources:**
|
||
- OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities) API / datasets
|
||
- NVD (CVE/NVD feeds)
|
||
- GitHub Security Advisories (GHSA)
|
||
- OWASP references (for categorization)
|
||
|
||
**Candidate Data Model:**
|
||
- `VulnerabilityRecord`
|
||
- `ecosystem` (pypi/npm/crates/maven/go/vcpkg/etc)
|
||
- `package`
|
||
- `affected_versions`
|
||
- `severity`
|
||
- `summary`
|
||
- `references`
|
||
|
||
**UI/UX:**
|
||
- Dependencies panel: inline warning badges and <20>View Advisory<72>.
|
||
- Problems panel: security diagnostics with severity.
|
||
- Agent hints: prefer safe alternatives when available.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Semantic Annotations for Library APIs — IMPLEMENTED (Sprint 6, Steps 193–194)
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Tag library functions/types with semantic annotations (e.g., `@serialize`, `@crypto`, `@io`) so humans/agents can discover intent-driven APIs quickly.
|
||
|
||
**Concept:**
|
||
- Add annotation metadata for library symbols (by library + symbol).
|
||
- Attach annotations to `ExternalModule` / `TypeSignature` nodes.
|
||
- Use annotations to filter in Library Browser and guide agent completion.
|
||
|
||
**Candidate Storage:**
|
||
- `annotations/library_semanno.json` (or similar)
|
||
- Format: `{ library: { symbol: [annotations...] } }`
|
||
|
||
**UI/UX:**
|
||
- Library Browser: filter by annotation tag.
|
||
- Completion ranking: prioritize annotated matches for task keywords.
|
||
- Agent prompts: <20>Use @serialize APIs<49> guidance.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Notes
|
||
- Treat these as separate features to schedule independently.
|
||
- Likely Sprint 6/7, after core library-aware flow is stable.
|
||
|
||
## LLM Tooling & MCP Bridge — PLANNED (Sprint 7, Steps 202–234)
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Make the agent API easy for LLMs to use and optionally expose it via MCP.
|
||
|
||
**Status:** Full plan written in `sprint7_plan.md`. 33 steps across 6 phases:
|
||
- Phase 7a: API documentation & JSON schemas (Steps 202–206)
|
||
- Phase 7b: MCP server with tools/resources/prompts (Steps 207–213)
|
||
- Phase 7c: Synthetic trace generation for training data (Steps 214–219)
|
||
- Phase 7d: Evaluation harness for LLM tool-use accuracy (Steps 220–224)
|
||
- Phase 7e: Model-specific tool definitions — Claude, Codex, open-source (Steps 225–229)
|
||
- Phase 7f: Session recording pipeline — capture, anonymize, export (Steps 230–234)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
## PHP Language Support (Full Pipeline) <20> PROPOSED
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Add full PHP support (parse, AST, generate, project, and annotations) to Whetstone.
|
||
|
||
**Scope:**
|
||
- Tree-sitter PHP parser integration
|
||
- PHP AST mapping to SemAnno concepts
|
||
- PHP generator with annotation-aware output
|
||
- Cross-language projection to/from PHP
|
||
- Tests: parse/generate round-trip, annotation preservation, projection matrix coverage
|
||
|
||
**Notes:**
|
||
- Start with core PHP syntax (functions, classes, namespaces, arrays, exceptions, traits).
|
||
- WordPress-specific libraries on top of core PHP support.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## WordPress Support (Library + Semantics) <20> PROPOSED
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Enable WordPress-aware tooling on top of PHP support.
|
||
|
||
**Scope:**
|
||
- Library symbol stubs for WordPress core APIs
|
||
- Semantic tags for WP concepts (hooks, filters, actions)
|
||
- Agent suggestions for safe WP patterns
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Rust Plugin Packaging (Conflict Resolver) <20> PROPOSED
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Package a Rust-based topological conflict resolver as a Whetstone plugin.
|
||
|
||
**Scope:**
|
||
- Define plugin interface for external tools
|
||
- Packaging format and plugin discovery/loading
|
||
- Example integration with a Rust binary or shared library
|
||
|
||
## Julia Language Support (Full Pipeline) <20> PROPOSED
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Add full Julia support (parse, AST, generate, project, and annotations) to Whetstone.
|
||
|
||
**Scope:**
|
||
- Tree-sitter Julia parser integration
|
||
- Julia AST mapping to SemAnno concepts
|
||
- Julia generator with annotation-aware output
|
||
- Cross-language projection to/from Julia
|
||
- Tests: parse/generate round-trip, annotation preservation, projection matrix coverage
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Julia ML Projection Layer <20> PROPOSED
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Map common Python ML/Numerical APIs to Julia equivalents while preserving optimization intent.
|
||
|
||
**Scope:**
|
||
- API mapping table (NumPy/Pandas/Torch core calls ? Julia equivalents)
|
||
- Semantic tags for numerical/tensor operations
|
||
- Fallback interop for unmapped calls (PyCall/JuliaCall)
|
||
- Dual projections: clean surface Julia + preserved optimization annotations
|
||
|
||
|
||
## Julia Packaging Strategy <20> PROPOSED
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Define a reliable packaging path for Julia-based artifacts.
|
||
|
||
**Scope:**
|
||
- Document options: runtime install, PackageCompiler.jl, embedding Julia as a library
|
||
- Provide recommended defaults for CLI tools vs GUI apps
|
||
- Include guidance for minimizing startup latency and bundle size
|
||
|
||
## Python/C++/JS-TS Support Enhancements <20> PROPOSED
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Expand first-class support for Python, C++, and JS/TS beyond current parse/generate.
|
||
|
||
**Scope:**
|
||
- Improve language-specific projection fidelity and diagnostics
|
||
- Expand standard library and ecosystem stubs (pip/npm/vcpkg)
|
||
- Add language-specific refactor recipes and annotation guidance
|
||
- Strengthen test corpus and projection round-trip coverage
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Plugin System Enhancements <20> PROPOSED
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Expand plugin support for external tools and language packs.
|
||
|
||
**Scope:**
|
||
- Standardize plugin packaging format
|
||
- Document plugin API and lifecycle hooks
|
||
- Add plugin discovery and version compatibility checks
|
||
- Provide example plugins for language packs and external analyzers
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Resource Lock Constraints on TaskItems — SPRINT 46 CANDIDATE
|
||
|
||
**Filed by:** HiveMind project agent (2026-02-21)
|
||
**Priority:** High — blocks correct parallel scheduling
|
||
**Source spec:** `hivemind/docs/WHETSTONE_FEATURE_REQUEST_RESOURCE_LOCKS.md`
|
||
**Components:** `AnnotatedTaskitem` schema, `whetstone_generate_taskitems`, `whetstone_queue_ready`, `whetstone_validate_taskitem`
|
||
|
||
**Problem:**
|
||
`dependencyTaskIds` models causal ordering (DAG edges). It does not model mutual
|
||
exclusion — two tasks that cannot run concurrently because they share a resource,
|
||
even though neither depends on the other's output. Without this, the scheduler must
|
||
either serialize everything or rely on humans to catch conflicts. Both fail at scale.
|
||
|
||
**Proposed schema addition:**
|
||
```typescript
|
||
interface AnnotatedTaskitem {
|
||
// ... existing fields ...
|
||
|
||
// NEW
|
||
resourceLocks?: string[]; // Named resources held exclusively during execution.
|
||
// Tasks with overlapping locks are serialized by scheduler.
|
||
// Node-local by default. Prefix "global:" for swarm-wide mutex.
|
||
// Examples: "drone-process", "sqlite-db", "file:/path/to/f",
|
||
// "global:nexus-jobs-queue"
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Key distinction:**
|
||
| Field | Meaning | Relationship |
|
||
|-------|---------|--------------|
|
||
| `dependencyTaskIds: [A]` | A must finish before I start | Directed — A → B |
|
||
| `resourceLocks: ["db"]` | I need exclusive access to "db" while running | Undirected — A ↔ B |
|
||
|
||
**`exclusionGroup` as sugar:** `exclusionGroup: "X"` expands to `resourceLocks: ["group:X"]`.
|
||
One model, two syntaxes.
|
||
|
||
**Lock scope convention (addition to original spec):**
|
||
All locks are node-local by default. Prefix `global:` for swarm-wide mutual exclusion.
|
||
HiveMind's scheduler knows the dispatch target node and enforces accordingly.
|
||
|
||
**Sprint 46 plan (5 steps):**
|
||
1. Schema: add `resourceLocks?: string[]` to `AnnotatedTaskitem`
|
||
2. Generator: infer locks in `TaskitemGeneratorV2` from spec signals ("both tests spin up a drone" → `drone-process`, "shared SQLite DB" → `sqlite-db`, "same port" → `nexus-port-N`)
|
||
3. MCP: surface locks in `whetstone_generate_taskitems` output
|
||
4. Queue: add `resource_conflict_unresolved` warning class to `whetstone_queue_ready` (warn on serialization, don't block)
|
||
5. Validation: `whetstone_validate_taskitem` checks lock name format, flags node-local vs global ambiguity
|
||
|
||
**Precedent:** GNU Make `.NOTPARALLEL`, Bazel `tags=["exclusive"]`, GitHub Actions `concurrency:`, Kubernetes resource quotas, POSIX `flock(2)`.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Deterministic MCP Debugging Workflow for SLM Agents — PROPOSED
|
||
|
||
**Filed by:** Whetstone execution session (2026-02-21)
|
||
**Priority:** Critical for self-improving low-context agents
|
||
**Goal:** Make generation + debugging robust enough that small/local models can complete tasks without expert intuition.
|
||
|
||
### Why this matters
|
||
|
||
Current flow is strong for generation and validation, but debugging still relies heavily on manual compile/test interpretation. Strong agents can compensate; weaker agents cannot. The system needs deterministic failure triage and patch guidance, not just raw logs.
|
||
|
||
### Feature Request A: Structured Failure Packet Tool
|
||
|
||
**Tool name:** `whetstone_capture_failure_packet`
|
||
|
||
**Problem:**
|
||
Compile/test output is noisy and non-deterministic across environments. SLMs need compact, stable failure packets.
|
||
|
||
**Requirements:**
|
||
- Input: command, cwd, optional target (`step707_test`, etc.)
|
||
- Output packet fields:
|
||
- `failureClass` (`compile_error`, `test_assertion`, `schema_error`, `tool_contract_error`, `runtime_error`)
|
||
- `primaryFile`, `primaryLine`, `primarySymbol`
|
||
- `normalizedMessage` (deduped, canonicalized)
|
||
- `reproCommand`
|
||
- `firstFailingTest` (if test run)
|
||
- `confidence`
|
||
- Deterministic normalization rules (same stderr -> same packet).
|
||
|
||
**Acceptance criteria:**
|
||
- Same failing command produces byte-stable JSON packet across repeated runs.
|
||
- Packet size bounded (e.g., <= 8 KB) with deterministic truncation.
|
||
|
||
### Feature Request B: Root-Cause Clustering Tool
|
||
|
||
**Tool name:** `whetstone_cluster_failures`
|
||
|
||
**Problem:**
|
||
One broken include can yield dozens of compiler errors. Small models need one root cause, not 50 symptoms.
|
||
|
||
**Requirements:**
|
||
- Group errors by root cause signature (`missing_symbol`, `type_mismatch`, `include_cycle`, `schema_shape_mismatch`).
|
||
- Return ordered clusters with:
|
||
- `clusterId`
|
||
- `rootCauseCandidate`
|
||
- `blastRadius`
|
||
- `fixFirst` boolean
|
||
- Deterministic ordering by severity + source location.
|
||
|
||
**Acceptance criteria:**
|
||
- At least 80% reduction in symptom-level errors shown to agent for common compile breaks.
|
||
|
||
### Feature Request C: Patch Proposal Tool
|
||
|
||
**Tool name:** `whetstone_propose_patch_for_failure`
|
||
|
||
**Problem:**
|
||
Weak agents can identify a failure but cannot reliably synthesize a minimal fix.
|
||
|
||
**Requirements:**
|
||
- Input: failure packet + repository context slice.
|
||
- Output:
|
||
- `patchPlan` (ordered edit intents)
|
||
- `candidatePatch` (unified diff)
|
||
- `riskLevel`
|
||
- `expectedTestsToRun`
|
||
- Must include explicit invariants ("do not alter unrelated files", "preserve JSON schema keys").
|
||
|
||
**Acceptance criteria:**
|
||
- Patch can be applied automatically in dry-run mode.
|
||
- For known failure fixtures, first proposal passes targeted test in >=60% cases.
|
||
|
||
### Feature Request D: Deterministic Debug Loop Orchestrator
|
||
|
||
**Tool name:** `whetstone_debug_until_green`
|
||
|
||
**Problem:**
|
||
Current workflows require manual sequencing: run test, parse output, patch, rerun.
|
||
|
||
**Requirements:**
|
||
- Single loop with explicit phases:
|
||
1. reproduce
|
||
2. capture failure packet
|
||
3. cluster root cause
|
||
4. propose patch
|
||
5. apply patch (optional gated)
|
||
6. rerun targeted tests
|
||
7. emit outcome report
|
||
- Hard iteration cap (`maxIterations`) and stop reasons.
|
||
- Full state machine emitted as JSON transitions.
|
||
|
||
**Acceptance criteria:**
|
||
- Re-running with same seed/state yields same action sequence.
|
||
- No hidden state outside packet history.
|
||
|
||
### Feature Request E: Repro Packet Archive & Replay
|
||
|
||
**Tool names:** `whetstone_save_repro_packet`, `whetstone_replay_repro_packet`
|
||
|
||
**Problem:**
|
||
Debugging quality is hard to improve without stable training/eval fixtures.
|
||
|
||
**Requirements:**
|
||
- Save packet: failing command, env snapshot, file hashes, failure packet, patch attempt history.
|
||
- Replay packet in sandbox and verify same failure class before patching.
|
||
- Export format compatible with LoRA/SLM fine-tuning datasets.
|
||
|
||
**Acceptance criteria:**
|
||
- Replay reproduces same `failureClass` and `primaryFile` for >=95% captured packets.
|
||
|
||
### Feature Request F: Minimal Context Assembler for Fixing
|
||
|
||
**Tool name:** `whetstone_assemble_fix_context`
|
||
|
||
**Problem:**
|
||
Small models degrade when given broad context.
|
||
|
||
**Requirements:**
|
||
- Input: failure packet/cluster.
|
||
- Output: minimal file slices needed to fix:
|
||
- failing file span
|
||
- relevant headers
|
||
- nearest tests
|
||
- related schema/tool contract
|
||
- Token budget modes: `tiny`, `small`, `medium`.
|
||
|
||
**Acceptance criteria:**
|
||
- Produces <=2k token context in `tiny` mode while preserving fix success on benchmark fixtures.
|
||
|
||
### Feature Request G: Regression Guard Tool
|
||
|
||
**Tool name:** `whetstone_regression_guard`
|
||
|
||
**Problem:**
|
||
A fix may pass one test but silently break prior working behavior.
|
||
|
||
**Requirements:**
|
||
- Given touched files + step ID, compute deterministic smoke set:
|
||
- failing target
|
||
- neighboring step tests
|
||
- MCP tool registration checks
|
||
- Emit `mustPass`, `optional`, and `deferred` buckets.
|
||
|
||
**Acceptance criteria:**
|
||
- Any patch merged by autonomous loop includes a guard report with pass/fail matrix.
|
||
|
||
### Feature Request H: Debugging Metrics for SLM Readiness
|
||
|
||
**Metric packet fields:**
|
||
- `timeToFirstGreen`
|
||
- `iterationsToGreen`
|
||
- `tokenCostPerFix`
|
||
- `symptomToRootCauseCompression`
|
||
- `patchAcceptanceRate`
|
||
- `regressionEscapeRate`
|
||
|
||
**Requirement:**
|
||
- Metrics available per run and aggregated by failure class.
|
||
- Used to decide when to switch work from large model -> SLM.
|
||
|
||
### Proposed rollout
|
||
|
||
1. Phase 1: Failure packet + clustering (`A`, `B`)
|
||
2. Phase 2: Patch proposal + fix context (`C`, `F`)
|
||
3. Phase 3: Loop orchestrator + regression guard (`D`, `G`)
|
||
4. Phase 4: Replay archive + readiness metrics (`E`, `H`)
|
||
|
||
### Done definition for “SLM-ready debugging”
|
||
|
||
- A small model can take a single failing test target and autonomously produce a patch that passes:
|
||
- target test,
|
||
- deterministic regression guard set,
|
||
- MCP tool schema checks,
|
||
- with full repro packet trace and no manual intervention.
|