37 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
37 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
# Sprint 95 Plan: Human Factors and Review Ergonomics at Scale
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Program throughput is increasingly constrained by reviewer attention and cognitive
|
|
load. Sprint 95 optimizes review ergonomics and decision quality.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Goals
|
|
|
|
1. Reduce reviewer cognitive load while preserving rigor
|
|
2. Improve triage precision for high-risk changes
|
|
3. Measure and optimize review latency/consistency
|
|
4. Prevent reviewer fatigue-driven quality regressions
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Steps
|
|
|
|
### Step 1179: Reviewer load and fatigue model (12 tests)
|
|
### Step 1180: Priority-focused review queue shaping engine (10 tests)
|
|
### Step 1181: Decision consistency analyzer across reviewers (10 tests)
|
|
### Step 1182: Explainability compression model for rapid review (10 tests)
|
|
### Step 1183: Escalation guidance recommender for ambiguous cases (10 tests)
|
|
### Step 1184: Review SLA policy integration (8 tests)
|
|
### Step 1185: `whetstone_get_review_load_status` MCP tool (8 tests)
|
|
### Step 1186: `whetstone_optimize_review_queue` MCP tool (8 tests)
|
|
### Step 1187: Reviewer effectiveness report artifact (8 tests)
|
|
### Step 1188: Sprint 95 integration summary + regression (8 tests)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Human-Factors Rule
|
|
|
|
- Queue shaping must prioritize risk while respecting reviewer capacity limits.
|