Add LLM tooling feature request
This commit is contained in:
@@ -57,3 +57,19 @@
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
- Treat these as separate features to schedule independently.
|
||||
- Likely Sprint 6/7, after core library-aware flow is stable.
|
||||
|
||||
## LLM Tooling & MCP Bridge
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Make the agent API easy for LLMs to use and optionally expose it via MCP.
|
||||
|
||||
**Concept:**
|
||||
- Document JSON-RPC API with schemas and examples.
|
||||
- Generate synthetic interaction traces for fine-tuning / tool-use evaluation.
|
||||
- Add an MCP server wrapper that exposes current agent methods as MCP tools/resources.
|
||||
|
||||
**Candidate Deliverables:**
|
||||
- `docs/AGENT_API.md` with request/response schemas
|
||||
- Example flows: read AST ? mutate ? verify
|
||||
- MCP bridge module (optional): maps JSON-RPC to MCP tools
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -482,3 +482,4 @@ Sprint 5 in progress. Step 135 (library-aware completion) done. Next: Step 136 (
|
||||
| 2026-02-09 | Codex | Step 134: PrimitivesRegistry aggregating builtins, imports, and in-scope symbols. 6/6 tests pass. |
|
||||
| 2026-02-09 | Codex | Step 135: Library-aware completion ordering with auto-import hints for non-primitive symbols. 5/5 tests pass. |
|
||||
| 2026-02-09 | Codex | Added FEATURE_REQUESTS.md to track security vulnerability awareness and semantic library annotations for future sprints. |
|
||||
| 2026-02-09 | Codex | Added LLM tooling + MCP bridge feature request to FEATURE_REQUESTS.md. |
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user