Complete Step 482: step spec expander
This commit is contained in:
Bill
149
editor/tests/step482_test.cpp
Normal file
149
editor/tests/step482_test.cpp
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
|
||||
// Step 482: Step Spec Expander Tests (unit, negative, boundary)
|
||||
|
||||
#include "StepSpecExpander.h"
|
||||
|
||||
#include <iostream>
|
||||
#include <string>
|
||||
|
||||
static int passed = 0, failed = 0;
|
||||
#define TEST(name) { std::cout << " " << #name << "... "; }
|
||||
#define PASS() { std::cout << "PASS\n"; ++passed; }
|
||||
#define FAIL(msg) { std::cout << "FAIL: " << msg << "\n"; ++failed; }
|
||||
#define CHECK(cond, msg) if (!(cond)) { FAIL(msg); return; } else {}
|
||||
|
||||
void test_classifies_trivial_for_small_utility_step() {
|
||||
TEST(classifies_trivial_for_small_utility_step);
|
||||
StepExpanderInput in;
|
||||
in.stepMarkdown = "Add a simple utility struct with one helper.";
|
||||
in.stepNumber = "482";
|
||||
in.componentName = "UtilitySpec";
|
||||
auto spec = StepSpecExpander::expand(in);
|
||||
CHECK(spec.complexity == StepComplexity::Trivial, "expected trivial complexity");
|
||||
CHECK(spec.testPlan.size() <= 4, "trivial test budget exceeded");
|
||||
PASS();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void test_classifies_pipeline_when_workflow_keywords_present() {
|
||||
TEST(classifies_pipeline_when_workflow_keywords_present);
|
||||
StepExpanderInput in;
|
||||
in.stepMarkdown = "Build pipeline workflow integration across tools.";
|
||||
in.stepNumber = "482";
|
||||
in.componentName = "PipelineSpec";
|
||||
auto spec = StepSpecExpander::expand(in);
|
||||
CHECK(spec.complexity == StepComplexity::Pipeline, "expected pipeline complexity");
|
||||
CHECK(spec.testPlan.size() >= 6, "pipeline minimum coverage not met");
|
||||
CHECK(spec.testPlan.size() <= 10, "pipeline maximum exceeded");
|
||||
PASS();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void test_includes_negative_tests_when_validation_terms_present() {
|
||||
TEST(includes_negative_tests_when_validation_terms_present);
|
||||
StepExpanderInput in;
|
||||
in.stepMarkdown = "Validate input and reject invalid shape.";
|
||||
in.stepNumber = "482";
|
||||
in.componentName = "ValidatorSpec";
|
||||
auto spec = StepSpecExpander::expand(in);
|
||||
bool foundNegative = false;
|
||||
for (const auto& t : spec.testPlan) {
|
||||
if (t.type == PlannedTestType::Negative) foundNegative = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
CHECK(foundNegative, "expected negative test stubs");
|
||||
PASS();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void test_includes_boundary_tests_when_limit_terms_present() {
|
||||
TEST(includes_boundary_tests_when_limit_terms_present);
|
||||
StepExpanderInput in;
|
||||
in.stepMarkdown = "Compute score with max/min limit boundary checks.";
|
||||
in.stepNumber = "482";
|
||||
in.componentName = "ScoringSpec";
|
||||
auto spec = StepSpecExpander::expand(in);
|
||||
bool foundBoundary = false;
|
||||
for (const auto& t : spec.testPlan) {
|
||||
if (t.type == PlannedTestType::Boundary) foundBoundary = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
CHECK(foundBoundary, "expected boundary test stub");
|
||||
PASS();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void test_generated_test_names_follow_step_prefix_convention() {
|
||||
TEST(generated_test_names_follow_step_prefix_convention);
|
||||
StepExpanderInput in;
|
||||
in.stepMarkdown = "Standard generator step.";
|
||||
in.stepNumber = "482";
|
||||
in.componentName = "NameSpec";
|
||||
auto spec = StepSpecExpander::expand(in);
|
||||
CHECK(!spec.testPlan.empty(), "missing test stubs");
|
||||
CHECK(spec.testPlan[0].name.find("test_step482_") == 0, "test name prefix mismatch");
|
||||
PASS();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void test_header_skeleton_contains_expected_api_outline() {
|
||||
TEST(header_skeleton_contains_expected_api_outline);
|
||||
StepExpanderInput in;
|
||||
in.stepMarkdown = "Generate a step spec.";
|
||||
in.stepNumber = "482";
|
||||
in.componentName = "StepSpecEngine";
|
||||
auto spec = StepSpecExpander::expand(in);
|
||||
CHECK(spec.headerSkeleton.fileName == "StepSpecEngine.h", "header filename mismatch");
|
||||
CHECK(spec.headerSkeleton.methods.size() >= 3, "missing method stubs");
|
||||
CHECK(spec.headerSkeleton.fields.size() >= 3, "missing field stubs");
|
||||
PASS();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void test_build_entry_uses_cmake_target_pattern() {
|
||||
TEST(build_entry_uses_cmake_target_pattern);
|
||||
StepExpanderInput in;
|
||||
in.stepMarkdown = "Any step text.";
|
||||
in.stepNumber = "482";
|
||||
in.componentName = "BuildSpec";
|
||||
in.buildSystem = "cmake";
|
||||
auto spec = StepSpecExpander::expand(in);
|
||||
CHECK(spec.buildEntry.targetName == "step482_test", "target naming mismatch");
|
||||
CHECK(spec.buildEntry.snippet.find("add_executable(step482_test") != std::string::npos,
|
||||
"cmake snippet mismatch");
|
||||
PASS();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void test_empty_markdown_emits_warning_negative_case() {
|
||||
TEST(empty_markdown_emits_warning_negative_case);
|
||||
StepExpanderInput in;
|
||||
in.stepMarkdown = "";
|
||||
in.stepNumber = "482";
|
||||
in.componentName = "WarnSpec";
|
||||
auto spec = StepSpecExpander::expand(in);
|
||||
CHECK(!spec.warnings.empty(), "expected warning for empty markdown");
|
||||
PASS();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void test_complex_budget_expands_to_at_least_ten_tests() {
|
||||
TEST(complex_budget_expands_to_at_least_ten_tests);
|
||||
StepExpanderInput in;
|
||||
in.stepMarkdown =
|
||||
"Orchestrate dispatch protocol to extract conventions, validate context, generate skeleton, and integrate RPC.";
|
||||
in.stepNumber = "482";
|
||||
in.componentName = "ComplexSpec";
|
||||
auto spec = StepSpecExpander::expand(in);
|
||||
CHECK(spec.complexity == StepComplexity::Complex, "expected complex classification");
|
||||
CHECK(spec.testPlan.size() >= 10, "complex minimum budget not met");
|
||||
CHECK(spec.testPlan.size() <= 15, "complex budget upper bound exceeded");
|
||||
PASS();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int main() {
|
||||
std::cout << "Step 482: Step Spec Expander Tests\n";
|
||||
|
||||
test_classifies_trivial_for_small_utility_step(); // 1
|
||||
test_classifies_pipeline_when_workflow_keywords_present(); // 2
|
||||
test_includes_negative_tests_when_validation_terms_present(); // 3
|
||||
test_includes_boundary_tests_when_limit_terms_present(); // 4
|
||||
test_generated_test_names_follow_step_prefix_convention(); // 5
|
||||
test_header_skeleton_contains_expected_api_outline(); // 6
|
||||
test_build_entry_uses_cmake_target_pattern(); // 7
|
||||
test_empty_markdown_emits_warning_negative_case(); // 8
|
||||
test_complex_budget_expands_to_at_least_ten_tests(); // 9
|
||||
|
||||
std::cout << "\nResults: " << passed << "/" << (passed + failed)
|
||||
<< " passed\n";
|
||||
return failed == 0 ? 0 : 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user